Replace PowerScribe 360 with AI-Native Reporting
Built by a radiologist. Designed for the post-2027 reporting workflow — where the model drafts the report, the radiologist signs, and turnaround time stops being the bottleneck.
Explore the Path Forward
Migration Guide
600-word brief for CMIOs: what every clinical informatics leader needs to know before moving off PowerScribe 360 in 2027.
Read the guide →
30-Day Pilot
Scope, deliverables, success metrics, and exit criteria for a supervised 30-day pilot at a single site or specialty.
Pilot structure →
Peer-Reviewed Benchmarks
Validation methodology and forthcoming peer-reviewed benchmarks from customer sites. Contact us for early validation data.
See methodology →Why Teams Move Off PowerScribe
Dictation is the bottleneck
PowerScribe optimizes dictation-to-text. AI-native reporting flips the workflow: the model drafts, the radiologist verifies and signs.
2027 vendor uncertainty
Microsoft/Nuance DAX-Copilot roadmap for radiology remains unclear. Waiting means betting the reporting stack on an undefined product line.
Voice profile lock-in
Years of radiologist voice profiles, custom macros, and templates don't transfer. CMIOs should plan the migration, not avoid it.
Critical-results paths
PowerScribe has explicit critical-result flagging. AI-native systems must preserve — never bypass — radiologist-supervised critical communication.
TAT measurement
Modern reporting needs AI-suggested-to-accepted timing, not just dictation-to-sign. ApertureAI surfaces both layers.
Audit & liability
AI is the assistant, the radiologist is the author of record. Every ApertureAI report preserves radiologist attribution, signoff, and edit history.
Talk to Our Team
Whether you're scoping a 30-day pilot or evaluating AI-native reporting across an enterprise, we're happy to walk through the architecture, validation approach, and integration plan.
Start a Conversation Read the Migration Guide